.png)
- This topic has 72 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
These statements are the hookand liners always wanting more.The lake is hurting but push for more and laxed rules.Rape the resource
The first one
Resorters like Bill Eno of Twin Pines and Suzy Fisher of Fisher’s Resort made comments about the difficulties of running night launches when they have to be into shore by 10 p.m. to abide by the night ban rule. Fisher proposed the option of pushing the ban back by 30 minutes or an hour to allow for the launches to leave their fishing spot at 10 p.m. to maximize the fishing time for guests. She questioned what effect that time change would have on the reduction of kill.Then a realistic reply
When posed the question as to what the DNR would have done differently, Rick Bruesewitz, Aitkin fisheries supervisor, responded that he wouldn’t have let the resorters push and push for more fish each year to include more liberalized regulations. He said that perhaps that’s why they are in this situation now.the netters UH??
Of all the things I've ever done,
I aint never had Too much fun.
Dew everyone that is a regular here know what side of this you are on. Did you read the Star Tribune by Dick Stenberg who is a former DNR fisheries biologist who 12 years ago forecast problems for the lake’s walleyes?Read here
He is obviously an expert and not some “barstool biologist” . You see there are experts out there that do not agree with what is going on and see through the “scam” that is taking place at the top of the DNR.
The last 3 years have given us 3 different explanations as to what is going on with the lake, all of them being very different. There are many factors that are effecting the lake right now, some are controllable and some are not. The DNR needs to control the factors it can on the lake in the name of conservation. It is conservation that was given as the only factor that could lead to change by the supreme court.
con·ser·va·tion [kon-ser-vey-shuhn]
noun
1. the act of conserving; prevention of injury, decay, waste, or loss; preservation: conservation of wildlife; conservation of human rights.
2. official supervision of rivers, forests, and other natural resources in order to preserve and protect them through prudent management.
3. a district, river, forest, etc., under such supervision.
4. the careful utilization of a natural resource in order to prevent depletion.
DEW please explain to me why they continue to allow nets to be set during the spawn. You find a common theme throughout the management of most fish species in the DNR regulations, it is closed seasons. Closed season are an important function of protecting the resource. This is from the DNR web site http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/fish/walleye/management.html
On most waters, closed seasons protect walleye during spawning.
The DNR needs to practice what they preach and protect the spawn and preserve the resource(see definition #2) in the name of conservation…
Seems to me on this site if you dont believe its the netters and say so your posts get deleted and you get messages trying to force you into seeing it the other way,why a message and not a post to the subject I domt know.I will never see it the way alot of people do so dislike me delete me send me messages I dont really care.I will spread the word as I see fit,if it doesnt fit your agenda sorry.Hows that lawsuit goin by the way?Havnt heard much about it?50,000$ just sitting around isnt doing the walleyes any good,and I havnt heard the dnr shaking in their boots….
” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” />fthslsf wrote:
Seems to me on this site if you dont believe its the netters and say so your posts get deleted and you get messages trying to force you into seeing it the other way,why a message and not a post to the subject I domt know.I will never see it the way alot of people do so dislike me delete me send me messages I dont really care.I will spread the word as I see fit,if it doesnt fit your agenda sorry.Hows that lawsuit goin by the way?Havnt heard much about it?50,000$ just sitting around isnt doing the walleyes any good,and I havnt heard the dnr shaking in their boots….” title=”” class=”bbcode_smiley” />Nobody wants DNR to shake in their boots they want them to help fix the lake and make it better for all fisherman. This site lets you give your opinion one way or the other on this very important subject. You have the right to spread the word as you see fit that is why I and others have served this great nation for freedom and freedom of speech. But we also served so ALL MEN are treated EQUAL and no race no matter which one can not have more rights than any other race. I have said this before, if one MAN can use a net than all men can use a net but the people who care about the lake and understand netting during the spawn will eventually destroy the lake than the ones that care wouldn’t even use them.
There are many reasons for the decline of walleyes in Mille lacs lake but if you don’t think taking hundreds of thousands of egg laying walleyes (with nets) out of the equation year after year after year after year you are mistaken. The men and women that are trying to save this lake are trying their hardest. I wish them luck and hope the future looks brighter for Mille lacs……Kirk
Only 2 defining forces ever offered to die for you....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.Pro Staff- The Dangler
KING OF THE CATS CHAMPION 2011
Member Since: Jan 1970
Posts: 19694An I racist because I don’t like netters? If the netters were white I wouldn’t like them either. it has nothing to do with what race they are I don’t like them because they net..
Your down! Your down!!! Just kidding
” title=”
” class=”bbcode_smiley” />
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.