mille lac to close sept 6

Home Forums Lake State Fishing Central General Discussion mille lac to close sept 6

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 71 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #140816
    shefland
    Participant

      Location: walker
      Member Since: Nov 2005
      Posts: 450
      #686787
      MattNy
      Participant

        Location: cities during the week mille lacs on the weekends
        Member Since: Mar 2012
        Posts: 145

        This doesn’t surprise me one bit…….I think we all knew this was going to Happen!

        "LET ER BUCK"
        #686788
        moose-hunter
        Participant

          Location: outta here
          Member Since: May 2008
          Posts: 822

          Gov. Goofy caves in AGAIN! What a shocker!!

          #686789
          BuckSutherland
          Participant

            Member Since: Dec 2012
            Posts: 224

            Mille Lacs is just a preview of what’s to come for all of our natural resources with this pathetic DNR leading the charge.

            Still nobody has lost their job over this fiasco, just like when they watched the deer herd crater to a 40 year low. They have no clue what the hell they are doing in the woods or on the water.

            #686790
            fishnpole
            Participant

              Location: North shore of Mille Lacs
              Member Since: May 2012
              Posts: 1757

              $

              #686791
              fishnpole
              Participant

                Location: North shore of Mille Lacs
                Member Since: May 2012
                Posts: 1757

                $

                #686792
                fishnpole
                Participant

                  Location: North shore of Mille Lacs
                  Member Since: May 2012
                  Posts: 1757

                  $

                  #686786
                  Science
                  Participant

                    Member Since: May 2013
                    Posts: 98

                    It is good that they have decided to shut the lake down even if it was a little late. I hope in the future both sides stick to their quota.

                    #686793
                    Gunder2
                    Participant

                      Location: Maple grove
                      Member Since: May 2013
                      Posts: 603

                      Did they comment on if its shutdown through end of November?

                      #686794
                      leechlaker
                      Participant

                        Member Since: Aug 2013
                        Posts: 85

                        Science wrote:
                        It is good that they have decided to shut the lake down even if it was a little late. I hope in the future both sides stick to their quota.

                        Good to see one sensible comment in here, anyway. I am no fan of Dayton, but he did the right thing here. There are a couple of really strong year classes in Mille Lacs…keep the pressure off them, let them grow and create more walleyes. Nothing wrong with this at all.

                        Next on the docket should be moving the possession limit to 3 fish, and either removing or really rethinking the slot limit to avoid skewing the size structure towards big fish. I assume everyone here is aware of the research that shows that the primary predators of young walleye are large walleye and pike (in that order).

                        Three fish with one over 20″ or something would be a sensible path, IMO.

                        #686795
                        Bandersnatch
                        Participant

                          Member Since: Feb 2005
                          Posts: 3409

                          leechlaker wrote:

                          Science wrote:
                          It is good that they have decided to shut the lake down even if it was a little late. I hope in the future both sides stick to their quota.

                          Good to see one sensible comment in here, anyway. I am no fan of Dayton, but he did the right thing here. There are a couple of really strong year classes in Mille Lacs…keep the pressure off them, let them grow and create more walleyes. Nothing wrong with this at all.

                          Next on the docket should be moving the possession limit to 3 fish, and either removing or really rethinking the slot limit to avoid skewing the size structure towards big fish. I assume everyone here is aware of the research that shows that the primary predators of young walleye are large walleye and pike (in that order).

                          Three fish with one over 20″ or something would be a sensible path, IMO.

                          1) He only posted that to stir the pot.

                          2) How do you correlate your wished for Slot with your Post? If the year classes need pressure taken off of them, and the larger Walleye are what really DO put that pressure on, then common sense would dictate that if there is going to be ANY SLOT at all, the slot should be do reduce the Larger Walleye to slow the predation.

                          3 fish, all over 24″ or you can make bank that we will be in the very same pickle in a couple of years.

                          JMO

                          #686796
                          Ripjiggen
                          Participant

                            Location: Minnesota
                            Member Since: Nov 2015
                            Posts: 637

                            Yes Gunder shutdown through November. Dec 1st will be the new season.
                            A three fish limit is a long way away in my opinion. Not going to go from shutting it down to three fish in the next year or two. If the tribes have anything to say about it which they do their will never be a three fish limit. The gov folded under pressure from the feds because they know they will lose in court and they will push for even more treaty rights. It is just sad to see this lake managed politically and have nothing to do with managing it scientifically.

                            #686797
                            Anonymous

                              Member Since: Jan 1970
                              Posts: 19694

                              What a joke the whole thing is and after 26 years of being on Mille lacs I’m done and moving my camp somewhere that don’t get raped and pillaged by !!

                              #686798
                              snow
                              Participant

                                Location: central mn
                                Member Since: Jul 2007
                                Posts: 4607

                                quote by leechlaker:

                                “Next on the docket should be moving the possession limit to 3 fish, and either removing or really rethinking the slot limit to avoid skewing the size structure towards big fish. I assume everyone here is aware of the research that shows that the primary predators of young walleye are large walleye and pike (in that order”

                                We know the primary predators of mille lacs leech…Its the gill netters,pull the nets and look what happens,2 banner year walleyes.

                                In these days and age do the natives need to hunt fish and gather when they’re busting at the seems with federal funds and casino monies? Hell No!

                                It baffels me why we non natives that generate over 100million $ each year paying taxes and license buying and then we are regulated just so the tribes can continue to pilage mille lacs each spring,way past due to cut the cord,no more federal monies and might as well setup toll booths at the casino’s enterance as well.And now the state wants to build a fishery and start stocking the lake while the natives sit back and wait for us to fix the problem just like red lake! BS.

                                #686799
                                WalleyeChaser
                                Participant

                                  Location: Fargo
                                  Member Since: Jan 2013
                                  Posts: 855

                                  from the article from OP:

                                  “Latest creel survey data indicated 45,276 pounds killed so far this year as of Aug. 15, well over the state’s 28,600 pound allocation. The open water season was catch and release in order to conserve walleye, but anglers exceeded the limit anyway via “hooking mortality” or the inadvertent killing of fish through hooking and handling them.”

                                  Does this seem hilarious to anyone else? Can hooking mortality really contribute this much?

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 71 total)
                                • The topic ‘mille lac to close sept 6’ is closed to new replies.